Skip to Content
Top

Reviews

  • Successful Employer Defense

    Established that Park One was not liable for the acts of its employee in this case.

  • $1.3M Judgement at Trial

    Successfully prevailed on a Motion for Summary Judgment as to liability.

  • Won Appeal Against Local Taxi Cab Company

    Prevailed in an appeal before the Third District Court of Appeal regarding an out of a vehicle accident involving a cab.

  • Firm Forces Non-Signatory to Agreement to Arbitration

    Rosenthal Law Group successfully obtained an order compelling arbitration on behalf of its client, an indoor trampoline park, in a personal injury lawsuit filed against its client.

  • Firm Obtains Summary Judgment in Construction Lien Case Involving Two Contracts and One Lien

    Firm Obtains Summary Judgment in Construction Lien Case Involving Two Contracts and One Lien

  • Firm Prevails on Appeal in Construction Lien Case

    Firm Prevails on Appeal in Construction Lien Case

  • Rosenthal Law Group Successfully Overtruned Longstanding Precedent Before the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

    Success in overturning longstanding precedent in En Banc Proceedings before the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

  • Summary Judgment in Favor of Commercial Property Summary Judgment in Favor of Commercial Property Owner in a Slip in Fall Case

     It is a rare, challenging, feat to obtain summary judgment in a defendant’s favor in a negligence action involving a slip and fall. However, this is exactly what Rosenthal Law Group did when the Honorable Rodolfo Ruiz of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit entered a sixteen-page Final Judgment granting Rosenthal Law Group’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed in favor of the defendant/landowner.

    Prior to the hearing on the motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff filed an affidavit of her mother in an attempt to create a genuine issue of material fact in order to prevent the entry of summary judgment. Relying upon the arguments made by Rosenthal Law Group, the Court ultimately ruled that the affidavit was insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact, and the entry of summary judgment was warranted.

    Rosenthal Law Group argued that the plaintiff’s mother’s affidavit contradicted the plaintiff’s previous deposition testimony wherein the plaintiff testified that her mother had no personal knowledge of the conditions of the room where the plaintiff slipped and fell and, further, the affiant provided no credible explanation for the discrepancy in the affidavit. Based upon such, the Court found that plaintiff was precluded from relying upon her mother’s affidavit in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. Moreover, Rosenthal Law Group argued, and the Court agreed, that the affidavit was also nevertheless insufficient because if the Court were to rely upon it, the Court would be required to engage in an impermissible stacking of inferences in order to create a factual issue. The judgment was appealed by the plaintiff to the Third District Court of Appeal, but no decisions have been made on appeal.

  • Successfully Obtained Order Staying Legal Proceedings in Florida Pending Prior Filed Action

    Rosenthal Law Group prevailed on a motion to stay proceedings in favor of the first-filed lawsuit which was pending in a different state.

    This case involved a dispute between two members of a New Jersey limited liability company. The two members of the limited liability company were in a dispute regarding the percentage of their respective membership interests in the limited liability company. Additionally, each member accused the other member of unlawfully misappropriating the limited liability company’s assets. As a result of the dispute, our client filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff in New Jersey – the first-filed action. A week later, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against our client in Florida – the subsequent-filed action.

    Rosenthal Law Group argued that because the issues in the subsequent-filed action mirrored the issues in the first-filed action and because there was substantial similarity between the parties and the actions, under the principle of priority, the subsequent-filed action must stay pending the outcome of the first-filed action.

    On May 31, 2017, the Honorable Michael L. Gates of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit agreed with our position and entered an order granting Rosenthal Law Group’s motion to stay proceedings in favor of the first-filed lawsuit.

  • Successfully Obtained Order Compelling Arbitration of a Commercial Claim Against the Firm’s Client.

    Successfully obtained order compelling arbitration of a commercial claim against the firm’s client, a credit card processing, alleging various business torts.

  • Obtained Order for a Corporate Defendant of a Personal Injury Claim

    Successfully obtained order compelling arbitration on behalf of the corporate defendant of a personal injury claim against the trampoline park.

  • Judgment and Writ of Possession, Affirmed on Appeal

    Judgment and Writ of Possession, affirmed on appeal, in favor of commercial property owner against the tenant for failing to timely pay rent into the court registry.